Monday, 28 April 2008

Issues on the Urban Fringe

You need to know the difference between a greenfield and brownfiled site. You should be able to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages between each type of site.




The links below will help you with this task:





How GreenBelts have benefitted Britain (BBC Video)


"Elastic Band" Green Belt Claim (BBC Article)


Is the Greenbelt an outdated concept? (BBC Article)


Radio 4 News Report - "Is the Greenbelt an outdated concept?"


Warning over Green Belt Hunger (BBC Article)


Green Belt 'at risk of homes' (Gloucesteshire) (BBC Article)


New Developments in the Cambridgeshire Area


(linked to Urban sprawl) Cambridge Green Belt Study

A 'green and pleasant' land

Brownfield Land Development

Thursday, 17 April 2008

Settlement Processes in Leeds

Leeds has experienced all the major settlement processes at various stages in its historical growth to the present day.

The key processes and eras are:

INDUSTRIALISATION 1750 - 1900
URBANISATION 1800 - 1880
DEINDUSTRIALISATION 1900 - 1950
SUBURBANISATION 1910 - 1950
DECENTRALISATION 1960s - 2000
COUNTER-URBANISATION 1960s - 2000
REURBANISATION NOW

Using the following links you can idntify these key elements in the city's growth together with the industries and locations inherent in each settlement process.

Using this information construct a mini case study for your notes.

LEEDS

The Urban Geography of Leeds - You should have this document in your file!

Sunday, 13 April 2008

Latest Info on Sudan



Check the BBC News website to update your Case Studies.



Click logo

Thursday, 10 April 2008

The Largest Cities







Over the last 50 years, more and more cities have reached sizes that are historically unprecedented. While there are examples in history of cities that had populations of one million or more inhabitants (including imperial Rome at the height of its powers and Edo, the precursor of Tokyo in the 13th century), the city with several million inhabitants is a relatively new phenomenon.
London was the first city to have several million inhabitants, reaching this size in the second half of the 19th century, reflecting its status as the economic and political centre of the British Empire. By 2005, there were 50 cities with more than 5 million people, including 20 'mega-cities' with more than 10 million people.






Many other cities have grown very considerably. In 1990, the average size of the world's 100 largest cities was around 5.1 million inhabitants, compared to 2.1 million in 1950, around 700,000 in 1900 and just under 200,000 in 1800. (See graph below).
During the 1980s, many had more people moving out than moving in (since their population growth rate was lower than their rate of natural increase). These included Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Calcutta, Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro. However, the graph above shows that very large cities with relatively modest population growth rates can still have large annual increments in their populations.


In 2003, there were 20 megacities with over 10 million inhabitants. It is projected that by 2015, 22 cities will be this large, all but five of them in the developing world. The population of these 22 cities in 2015 will be about 358 million - 75 million more than today, but still only about 5 per cent of the expected global population of over 7 billion.



Regional patterns
Historically Asia has always had a high proportion of the world's largest cities - and South and Central America and North Africa have also long had large cities. In 2005, 28 of the world's 50 cities with over 5 million inhabitants were in Asia and this proportion is likely to increase, reflecting its increasing weight within the world economy.


Among the world's regions, North America and sub-Saharan Africa stand out as having most 'new' large cities - settlements that had not been founded or did not exist as urban centres by 1800. In 1900, Europe had more than half the world's 100 largest cities. Today it only has 53 of the world's 414 cities with a population of over 1 million.



Fast-growing cities
Although cities such as Lagos, Karachi and Dhaka are often said to be among the world's fastest growing cities, there are hundreds of smaller cities with higher population growth rates. Indeed census data shows that some relatively small urban centres have been growing by 10 or more per cent per year - far above even the fastest growing city listed above.

The current population of most of the world's largest urban areas including Tokyo, London, Los Angeles, Shanghai, Beijing, Jakarta, Dhaka and Bombay/Mumbai can go up or down by many million inhabitants, depending on which boundaries are used. This is why any international list of 'the world's largest cities' risks considerable inaccuracy as some city populations are for large urbanized regions with thousands of square kilometres while others are for older 'city boundaries' with a few hundred square kilometres.

Although it is often assumed that the world's most rapidly growing cities are concentrated in Latin America, Asia and Africa, this is not so. The table below shows how several cities in the United States rank among the most rapidly growing cities in the world during this century. For instance, Nairobi is often held up as one of the world's most rapidly growing cities - but both Miami and Phoenix in the United States had larger populations than Nairobi in 1990, although all were small settlements in 1900.



FACTSHEETS

Use this LINK to access key data sheets for your NOTES on GLOBAL URBAN GROWTH


BACKGOUND

Use this LINK for useful comparisons of major cities around the world.
The URBAN GEOGRAPHY OF LEEDS is a document you need and should read




Tuesday, 1 April 2008

Latest Immigration News


Check out the latest news and data on immigration in the UK. You will find some interesting and very relevant data on this news page from the bbc.




Read through and add the relevant data an facts to your notes. This is excellent material to support your notes on Cost Benefits (see blog for March 15th).


Happy holidays!

Sunday, 16 March 2008

EASTER HOLIDAY HOMEWORK

Over the Easter Vacation build a Case Study on:

REFUGEE MIGRATION IN SUDAN

Create a 4 page (max) A4 doc and email to: SD@gsal.org.uk (deadline 8/4/08)

You will need to include information on the following sections together with maps, data tables and images.

  • Introduction and Background
  • How did the conflict start?
  • What is the Sudanese government doing?
  • What has happened to the civillians?
  • What is being done to help?
  • What is the International Community doing?

Saturday, 15 March 2008

The Costs and Benefits of Migration

Migration affects both the area of origin and the area of destination. The effects of migration can be:

Economic

Social
Environmental

Cultural





The Costs and Benefits of Economic Migration
IMPACT ON ORIGIN / SOURCE COUNTRY
ECONOMIC COSTS
  • Loss of young adult labour force
  • Loss of skills base and entrepreneurs - could slow economic development
  • out - migration may cause spital of decline which is difficult to halt (see link on NE Deindustrialisation blog)
  • Loss of labour may discourage inward investment, increasing dependence on government support.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
  • Prospect of reduced under emloyment in the source country
  • Returning migrants bring new skills to the country which may revitalise home country economy
  • Money sent home by migrants may be invested in the home economy or businesses
  • Les pressure on resources including basic supplies such as food and water and essentail services such as healthcare

SOCIAL COSTS
  • Perceived benefits of migration continue to encourage following generations to migrate with a net detrimental effect on social structure
  • Disproportionate number of females left behind
  • Non return of migrants leaves imbalance in population structure with long term consequences
  • Returning retired migrants may impose social cost on the community if there is an inadequate support mechanism to cater for them
SOCIAL BENEFITS
  • Population density reduced and birth rate decreases (young fertile who migrate)
  • Money sent home by migrants can finance improved education and healthcare facilities
  • Returning retired migrants increase social expectations within the community, e.g., demand for better leisure facilities

IMPACT ON DESTINATION COUNTRY
ECONOMIC COSTS
  • Cost of educating migrants' children
  • Increasing over dependence on migrant labour to support some industries (e.g. vegetable picking in East Anglia)
  • Leakage of money earned by migrants, including pension payments, goes back to country of origin
  • Increased numbers of people puts pressure on existing resources such as health services and education.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
  • Migrants take up less desirable jobs
  • Host country gains skilled labour at reduced cost
  • 'Skills gap' in host country may be filled by qualified migrant workers
  • Retirement costs are transferred back to the source country
SOCIAL COSTS
  • Discrimination against minorities leads to civil unrest and political extremism
  • The dominance of males is reinforced, especially in countries where the status of women is low, e.g., Persian Gulf states
  • Aspects of cultural identity are lost, particularly among second and third generation migrants
  • Segregated areas of similar ethnic groups are created, and schools become dominated by migrant children
SOCIAL BENEFITS
  • Creation of a multicultural society increases awareness, respect and understanding of other cultures
  • Influx of new and revitalised community services and businesses, e.g. corner shops and Turkish baths
  • Growth of ethnic retailing and areas associated with ethnic food and textile outlets, e.g. fabric shops in Manningham, Bradford

Check this link on the impact of Economic Migration
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2019385.stm
ACTIVITYThe Poles are Coming (BBC 2 11 March 2008) - Following the broadcast (Click to see clip) and the notes you made from the programme, together with reading through the links on the Case Studies blog, use the bullet points above to compile a list of the COSTS & BENEFITS of Polish migration to the UK and Poland.